![]() There was even an archery range and gun shooting range, to keep up those marksmanship skills since Swedes would be expected to keep fighting it out with the Soviets after the nuclear missiles between the U.S. In fact, from the realistic and natural imagery, it seemed as if it was already in good, practical use.Īnd that’s precisely what’s so jarring for viewers today. The range of activities displayed showed that this was not underground space wasted. Simultaneously, the also made sure to maintain the economic argument. These activities were supposed to connote tradition and Swedishness according the ideas of the People’s Home and thus make the shelters’ integration into modern life seem less arbitrary. The authors explain that Sweden’s social welfare state, sometimes called The People’s Home, meant that technology and creature comforts in the bunker would be provided for the wellbeing of the people above and beyond mere survival: The 2018 paper Urban Catastrophe and Sheltered Salvation by Peter Bennesved & Fredrik Norén helps give context to the film within Swedish culture at the time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |